New Legislation Would Strengthen 340B Program, Demand Transparency, Accountability for Drug Makers

by Admin | June 13, 2018 3:25 pm

Rep. Doris Matsui (center) speaks at a Capitol Hill briefing on the 340B program in April.

June 13, 2018—Newly introduced legislation would demand accountability and transparency from drug manufacturers participating in the 340B drug pricing program. The bill, sponsored by Rep. Doris Matsui (D-Calif.), is the most significant pro-340B proposal in nearly a decade.

Under the Matsui bill, known as the Stretching Entity Resources for Vulnerable Communities (SERV Communities) Act, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) would be required to move forward with assessing penalties against drug companies if they “knowingly and intentionally” charge more than the allowable price to 340B hospitals, clinics, and health centers. The bill would codify in the 340B law HRSA’s longstanding policy that requires manufacturers to sell drugs to 340B providers at a penny in certain cases when they raise their prices significantly higher than the rate of inflation. Additionally, the bill would require the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to launch a secure website within 90 days that gives providers access to 340B prices, something Congress first directed HHS to do eight years ago but the agency has not yet implemented.

Matsui’s legislation would also reverse controversial Medicare Part B payment cuts that went into effect on Jan. 1, 2018, for many 340B hospitals, which reduced what Medicare pays by nearly 30 percent taking away a total of $1.6 billion in 2018 alone. The bill would order the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to pay 340B hospitals at the same rate they pay all other hospitals. Those cuts have drawn strong opposition on Capitol Hill, where nearly 200 House members have cosponsored legislation by Rep. David McKinley (R-W.Va.) to block them. Several national hospital organizations and several hospitals and systems have taken the government to court to challenge the legality of those cuts. That suit is still pending.

As she introduced her bill, Matsui said, “Hospitals and clinics doing life-saving work rely on the 340B Program to help them provide inclusive and affordable care in their communities. . .This legislation makes clear the importance of preserving the program so safety net providers can continue to serve low-income and vulnerable patients, while expanding it to help address the opioid crisis.”

The Matsui bill was endorsed by several major hospital associations including 340B Health, the American Hospital Association, America’s Essential Hospitals, the California Hospital Association, the Association of American Medical Colleges, the Children’s Hospital Association, and Dignity Health. In a statement, 340B Interim President and Chief Executive Officer Maureen Testoni said, “This legislation is essential to the success of the 340B program in helping safety net providers meet the health needs of low-income and rural patients across the country. By holding pharmaceutical manufacturers accountable for their actions and providing pricing transparency to the thousands of safety-net providers that participate in the program, the SERV Communities Act will reduce costs and expand access to needed care.”

Other provisions of the Act would:

Matsui’s bill follows the introduction in recent months of several anti-340B measures that would freeze participation in the program and impose significant reporting requirements on hospitals and other providers. Congressional committees have also held a number of hearings looking at the program and another one is scheduled for June 19.

Follow | Share | Like
  1. [Image]:
  2. [Image]:
  3. :

Source URL: